ANNEXURE (53) [Vide Rule 67.6] Change in the entries in date of birth of teachers in non-government Secondary schools- SS CODE
ANNEXURE (53)
[Vide Rule 67.6]
Change in the entries in date of birth of teachers in non
government Secondary schools
It
has been brought to the notice of this office that in certain cases, the
entries in respect of date of birth of teachers in school record are incorrect
and particularly in view of pension scheme, the teachers are eager to get the
wrong entries in respect of date of birth in schools records duly corrected.
The matter was referred to government for consideration. Government have now
directed that the wrong entries of birth date of teachers in non-government
secondary schools should not be changed unless the provision of rule 171 (copy
enclosed) of the Bombay civil services rules are satisfied and unless the
permission is granted by the regional deputy director of education concerned.
You are granted by the regional deputy director of education concerned. You are
accordingly requested to bring the above requirements to the notice of all
teachers in yours school for their information and guidance. They should also
be informed that with a view to regularize the position the teachers already in
service and in whose case the wrong entries of birth dates in records need to
be corrected, they should apply to the regional deputy directors of education
through proper channel after fulfilling the requirements of rule 171 of the
B.C.S. Rs. And get the permission to correct wrong entries within a period of
two years from the date of issue of this circular and the teachers newly
appointed thereafter will have to get wrong entries of birth dates duly
corrected, if necessary, within a period of 2 years from the date of their
appointment.
(D.E’s
circular No. AMS. 1570/1/27124/C, dated 4th April 1972).
“An extract of Rule 171 of the B.C.S.
Rs”
171. In the service
book every step in a government servant’s official life, including temporary
and officiating promotions of all kinds, increments and transfer, and leave of
absence taken, should be regularly and concurrently recorded, each entry being
duly verified with reference to departmental orders, pay bills and leave
statements and attested by the head of the officer. If the government servant
is himself the head of an office the attestation should be made by his
immediate superior. Officiating and temporary service and leave taken prior to
first substantive appointment to a permanent post should also be recorded in
the service book and duly attested after verification. The date of birth should
be verified with reference to documentary evidence and a certificate recorded
to that effect stating the nature of the documentary relied on. In the case of
a government servant, the yeart of whose birth is known but not the date, the 1st
July should be treated as the date of birth. When both the year and the month
should be treated as the date of birth. When both the year and the month of
birth are known, but not the exact, the 16th of the month should be
treated as the date of birth. In the case of a government servant who is only
able to state his approximate age, and who appears to the attesting authority
to be of that age, the date of birth be assumed to be the corresponding date
after deducting the number of years representing his age from his date of
appointment. When the date, month and year of birth of a government servant not
known and he is unable to state his approximate age, the age by appearance as
stated in medical certificate of fitness, in the form prescribed in Rule 11,
should be taken as correct, he being assumed to have completed that age on the
date the certificate is given, and his date of birth reduced accordingly. When
once an entry of age or the date of birth has been made in a service book, no
alteration in the entry should be allowed, unless it is known, that the entry
was due to want of care on the part of some person other than the individual in
question or is an obvious clerical error. Officers of a rank not lower than the
principal district officer in the department concerned may correct errors in
the service book which are obviously clerical. Cases in which the correctness
of the original entry is questioned on other grounds should be referred to a
competent authority.
Finger prints of
the government servant should be recorded in the column headed “Personal marks
of identification” in the service book itself. The impressions should not be
taken on separate slips of paper and pasted to the service book.
Exception. – When a
military employees is transferred to a civil department and assumes a civilian
status or when a military employee discharged from the army without earning a
pension is employed in a civil department in which his military service counts
towards the date of birth to be entered in his service book or roll shall be
either that entered by the military authorities in his form of attestation when
he first joined the army or, if at the time of attestation he stated only his
approximate age, the date arrived at by deducting the number of years
representing his age from his date of appointment.
Note 1. - The
latest discharge certificate printed as Appendix-VIII (A) issued to military
employees on release of discharge does not provide for the age on the date of attestation
or enrolment. It does, however, provide inter alia for (i) age at the time of
completion of the certificate; and (ii) date of enrolment. In such cases the
age at the time of enrolment attestation should be worked out as indicated
below:
(a) Calculate the
difference between (i) the date of commanding officer’s signature (vide space
provided below serial No. 8 in the certificate) and (ii) the date of enrolment.
(b) Deduct the
period calculated as per (a) above from the age at the time of completion certificate.
(The date of commanding officer’s signature is the same as the date of
completion of the certificate vide serial no. 2 in the certificate).
“Once the age at
the time of enrolment is calculated the date of birth should be calculated as
per the exception above.”
Note 2. - Cases in
which the date of birth has been deducted by any other method from the age at
appointment or attestation, or cases in which government have passed specific
orders except a particular date of birth, need not be re-opened.
Comments
Post a Comment